Big Pharma

Dr. Paul Marik on Suppressing Ivermectin

EXPOSED! FDA, CDC & WHO is hiding this from you? | Dr Paul Marik FLCCC – Vijaya Viswanathan – YouTube

Dr. Paul E. Marik, founding member of FLCCC, in conversation with Vijaya Viswanathan, discusses the role of compromised medical & governmental institutions in manipulating medical data to make quick money. He exposes Big Pharma and its lobbies who invest millions to suppress data that can hinder their profits. While the big pharma makes millions out of the pandemic the poor continue to suffer. While the virus rages, people find themselves not only lacking in options but also a voice. Dr. Marik discusses in detail the inner mechanizations of the so-called people’s representatives, who have put people’s health on the line for short-term profits.

  1. 00:00– teaser
  2. 00:35– Guest introduction
  3. 03:42– Dr. Marik’s take on Ivermectin
  4. 09:16– WHO, FDA, Govt, Apollo hospitals opposes Ivermectin
  5. 12:22– Why is Ivermectin discouraged in the mainstream
    • Ivermectin is cheap – it could be distributed in 6 mg tablets by WHO for 2 cents per dose
    • Remdesivir $$3000-$4000 per course, and it does not reduce deaths and increases the length of hospitalization
  6. 14:40– Use of Ivermectin in Indian states
  7. 16:21– what is holding the physicians against ivermectin
    • Typical Physician afraid of and intimidated by FDA and Hospital management, and influence by the media, all of which are heavily influenced by Big Pharma
    • Massive increase in legal prescriptions for Ivermectin has triggered FDA’s aggressive stance against Ivermectin.
    • 20-30% of prescriptions are written “off-label”, meaning written for use other than original intent.
  8. 19:09– pharmacies denying ivermectin in the USA
  9. 7 billion people have been treated with Ivermectin safely
  10. 20:49– myth of scientific & academic freedom
    • New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet are controlled by Big Pharma
    • NIH partially own patents and it makes a lot of money from patented vaccines and drugs. They can’t make money from cheap, repurposed drugs. (21:30)
  11. 23:29– how ethical are randomized trials during the pandemic
    • Dr. Barik never recommends Ivermectin alone, so randomized controlled trials difficult to conduct
  12. 26:33– treatment protocol as per NIH, CDC & WHO
    • Initially: go home and when you can’t breathe, go to the hospital
    • Now: use Monoclonal Antibodies, but this is expensive and only small reduction in hospitalization
  13. 29:03– Dr. Marik’s take on vaccination
    • Ivermectin is a bridge to vaccination
    • Vaccination not as available to poor countries
    • Vaccine effectiveness waning; Ivermectin can only help
    • Natural immunity better than vaccine immunity
  14. 32:13 mass vaccination & implications
    • Antibody immune enhancement: As antibody levels decline, antibodies may ENHANCE instead of PROTECT against infection. This is a theory, not proven yet.
  15. 38:22– precautions against the pandemic
  16. 40:08– future of the pandemic hit world
    • Delta variant more deadly, spreads quickly, affects the youth, people get sicker faster
    • Need to treat from day one (or earlier)
    • Cheap, effective measures
      • Vitamin D, C
      •  Ivermectin
      • Gargle with mouthwash

 

 

Campaign against Ivermectin

  1. India’s Ivermectin Success Blackout by CDC, NIH, media, Wikipedia | ZeroHedge  (8/13/21)
    • See article for graph showing the dramatic improvement in COVID-19 cases and deaths after Ivermectin was distributed in the Uttar Pradesh province of India, April-July 2021.
    • There is a blackout on any conversation about how Ivermectin beat COVID-19 in India.  Ask yourself why India’s success against the Delta variant with Ivermectin is such a closely guarded secret by the NIH and CDC. Second, ask yourself why no major media outlets reported this fact, but instead, tried to confuse you with false information by saying the deaths in India are 10 times greater than official reports.
    • Wikipedia cannot mention the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie or Dr. Pierre Kory published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.   Nor is Wikipedia is allowed to publish the recent meta-analysis on Ivermectin authored by Dr. Andrew Hill, nor say anything concerning www.ivmmeta.com which shows the 63 studies comprising 23,000 patients which reveal an average of 86% reduction in death [prophylaxis] with Ivermectin.
    • MSN Showcases the Amazing Uttar Pradesh Turnaround—The Ivermectin-based Home Medicine Kits (trialsitenews.com)  (9/19/21)
      • MSN appears to be the first mainstream news source to recognize the amazing feat accomplished by the health agencies in India’s most populous state. The state experienced a massive spike in infections by April, but just two months later, the turnaround was well on its way, and what ensued should have been the story of the year
      • The WHO praised the effort but omitted the use of Ivermectin and early treatment
      • The WHO went on the offense once India established Ivermectin on its national protocol. WHO’s chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan tweeted that Ivermectin should not be used, referencing Merck’s warning about the drug. See TrialSite’s entry on the Merck-Ivermectin warning topic. Of course, this tweet triggered the Indian bar association lawsuit against WHO. Indirectly including Merck in her tweet, WHO’s Dr. Swaminathan insulted not only millions of people but also evidenced her true naivety… Merck has a huge conflict of interest in that they have a competing COVID-19 therapeutic—Molnupiravir.  Most certainly, that’s why over the past few months, an intense and particularly vile smear campaign emerged in mainstream media [against Ivermectin].
  2. Dr. Pierre Kory presents the evidence base supporting the efficacy of Ivermectin in prevention and treatment of COVID-19 to an audience of medical and other leaders in Sri Lanka (odysee.com)  and discusses the corruption of the medical establishment in suppressing Ivermectin (39-minute video plus 11 minutes of Q&A, 10/5/21)
  3. EXPOSED! FDA, CDC, NIH & WHO is hiding this from you? | Dr Paul Marik FLCCC – Vijaya Viswanathan – YouTube   9/6/21 (44 minutes at normal playback speed)
    • Ivermectin is cheap, safe, and effective against COVID-19 if used in combination with other drugs.
    • 3.7 billion people have been treated safely with Ivermectin
    • Physician reluctance to prescribe it due to intimidation by FDA and Hospital management (16:21)
    • Hospitals, FDA, CDC, NIH and WHO, the media, New England Journal of Medicine, and The Lancet medical journal are are all heavily funded and/or heavily influenced by Big Pharma
    • The NIH owns part of many patents and makes a lot of money from patented drugs and vaccines (conflict of interest).  And they can’t make any money off of cheap, repurposed drugs like Ivermectin.
    • For my detailed notes by minute/second marks, see Dr. Paul Marik on Suppressing Ivermectin
  4. Is Ivermectin Being Discredited To Pave Way For Big Pharma’s New Version Of Same Drug? (redvoicemedia.com)
    • The Armageddon that was unleashed this past week, in every form of media, from nighttime talk show hosts to every newspaper, to CNN to television, screaming about how this is a horse drug, and that people are dying from taking animal forms, you will understand why that was unleashed. <Big Pharma needs> to get rid of Ivermectin.
  5. The Great Ivermectin Deworming Hoax
  6.  SC Senate – Medical Affairs Subcommittee Testimony of Dr. Robert Jackson – YouTube  (9/22/21,  33 minutes but you can watch at 1.5x speed)
    • Excellent example of a Physician in the trenches vs. politicians and hospital administrators who would prefer to “follow established protocols” and avoid Ivermectin
    • Dr. Jackson related how his job at Spartanburg Regional is at risk for prescribing Ivermectin
    • Dr. Jackson mentioned Dr. Kory’s testimony on Ivermectin; also the excellent results in Peru, Argentina, India, and Mexico City.
    • Ivermectin is safe: 1 death/year vs. 500 deaths per year by Tylenol.
  7. Reuters show bias Attacking Ivermectin
  8. Military Doctor SUSPENDED For Writing Exemptions, Ivermectin Scripts – Oct 19 2021 (bitchute.com)
  9. Why all the fuss about Ivermectin and why is the establishment attacking it? – LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)
    • When FDA-approved medications are used in appropriate doses for appropriate patients, prescribed by competent physicians, the risks tend to be low, and any benefit should be celebrated. Instead, the medical establishment, media, and regulatory authorities are taking the opposite approach.
    • A study published several months ago in the American Journal of Therapeutics concluded Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery… and significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular [prophylactic] use of ivermectin.
    • Highly unvaccinated India had a surge in COVID cases earlier this year which abruptly ended following the widespread use of ivermectin, over the objections and criticism of the WHO. In the one state, Tamil Nadu, that did not use ivermectin, cases tripled instead of dropping by 97 percent as in the rest of the country.
    • The Japanese Medical Association recently endorsed ivermectin for COVID. The U.S. CDC cautioned against it.
    • Medical treatment involves balancing risks and benefits. When FDA-approved medications are used in appropriate doses for appropriate patients, prescribed by competent physicians, the risks tend to be low, and any benefit should be celebrated. Instead, the medical establishment, media, and regulatory authorities are taking the opposite approach. One has to wonder why. 

Conclusion of many: the use of cheap, effective treatments is not in the best interest of Big Pharma and Governments who wish to keep the people in a state of fear and compliance so they take the vaccine.

 

Why distrust the WHO

  1. How a false hydroxychloroquine narrative was created – 47 steps involving the WHO and other parties.
  2. The biggest crime committed during the vaccine heist is the censorship of Ivermectin – LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)
  3. Key definition changes by the WHO to make pandemic a more urgent crisis.
    1. Pandemic: Disease spreading worldwide.  Dropped from definition: (1) abnormally high number of sick people, and (2) abnormally high number of deaths.
    2. Herd Immunity: Can only be achieved via vaccination.  Previous definition: achieved from a majority of people getting infected and recovering + vaccination.
    3. Why Did the WHO Alter Its Definition of “Herd Immunity?”
    4. Highly unvaccinated India had a surge in COVID cases earlier this year which abruptly ended following the widespread use of ivermectin, over the objections and criticism of the WHO. In the one state, Tamil Nadu, that did not use ivermectin, cases tripled instead of dropping by 97 percent as in the rest of the country.
    • “TrustWHO,” a documentary film produced by Lilian Franck, reveals the clandestine influences that are controlling the World Health Organization, to the peril of public health.
    • Bill Gates is WHO’s No. 1 funder, contributing more to WHO’s $4.84 billion biennial budget than any member-state government.
    • Pharmaceutical companies previously influenced WHO’s 2009 pandemic declaration —  experts later called swine flu a “false pandemic” that was driven by Big Pharma, which then cashed in on the health scare.
    • WHO has strong allegiance to China, and its investigation into COVID-19’s origin was a “fake” investigation from the start.
    • Even prior to the COVID-19 pandemicWHO released a statement that it had been in discussions with Facebook to “ensure people can access authoritative information on vaccines and reduce the spread of inaccuracies.”
    • WHO’s history clearly illustrates its allegiance to Big Pharma and other industries, including downplaying the health effects caused by the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster and collaborating with opioid giant Purdue.
    • Given the strong and ongoing evidence that WHO is heavily conflicted and controlled by industry, its usefulness as a guardian of public health needs to be seriously reevaluated.
  4. The WHO pressured governments and professional societies to stop doctors prescribing hydroxychloroquine.  (Reuters, 5/26/21)
  5. MSN Showcases the Amazing Uttar Pradesh Turnaround—The Ivermectin-based Home Medicine Kits (trialsitenews.com)  (9/19/21)
    • MSN appears to be the first mainstream news source to recognize the amazing feat accomplished by the health agencies in India’s most populous state. The state experienced a massive spike in infections by April, but just two months later, the turnaround was well on its way, and what ensued should have been the story of the year
    • The WHO praised the effort but omitted the use of Ivermectin
    • The WHO went on the offense once India established Ivermectin on its national protocol. WHO’s chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan tweeted that Ivermectin should not be used, referencing Merck’s warning about the drug. See TrialSite’s entry on the Merck-Ivermectin warning topic. Of course, this tweet triggered the Indian bar association lawsuit against WHO. Indirectly including Merck in her tweet, WHO’s Dr. Swaminathan insulted not only millions of people but also evidenced her true naivety… Merck has a huge conflict of interest in that they have a competing COVID-19 therapeutic—Molnupiravir.  Most certainly, that’s why over the past few months, an intense and particularly vile smear campaign emerged in mainstream media [against Ivermectin].
  6. Corruption of the WHO and Bill Gates (28-minute video: GAVI is an NGO that pays no taxes yet has complete criminal immunity.
  7. Whistleblower claims WHO requested he alter report about Italy’s COVID response – Frontline News
  8. NIH Guidelines committee created for Covid treatment recommendations, in which 16 members have or had financial entanglements with Gilead, maker of Remdesivir. The members were appointed by the Co-Chairs. Two of the three Co-Chairs are themselves financially entangled with Gilead. Are you surprised that their guidelines recommend specifically against the use of hydroxychloroquine and in favor of Remdesivir, despite a Chinese Phase III study showing no benefit, which was mistakenly posted on the WHO website, then taken down?
  9. More Pandemic Corruption: Refusal to Fully Recognize Natural Immunity (trialsitenews.com)
    • Natural Antibodies Persist for More Than a Year After Infection: New Peer-Reviewed Study Finds (theepochtimes.com)  (10/4/21)
    • (6/1/21)  A recent study from the Cleveland Clinic found that individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection and have natural immunity are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccines can be safely prioritized to those who have not been infected before.
    • One study, published in The Lancet’s journal EClinicalMedicine, examined data from antibodies in 39,086 individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 from March 2020 and January 2021. It found an “encouraging timeline for the development and sustainability of antibodies up to ten months from natural infection.” This latest study adds to a growing body of scientific evidence indicating that natural immunity is long-lasting even without vaccination.
    • Another study, in Nature, found that COVID-19 infection “induces a robust antigen-specific, long-lived humoral immune response in humans,” with antibodies “remaining detectable at least 11 months after infection.” Another, published at BioRxiv, found that even without vaccination, antibodies in the infected “remain relatively stable from 6 to 12 months,” while “B cell clones expressing broad and potent antibodies are selectively retained in the repertoire over time and expand dramatically after vaccination.” Another study from Israel found that natural immunity was slightly more effective against reinfection than the Pfizer vaccine, at 94.8% versus 92.8%.

Why distrust the FDA

  1. Think the FDA Is Looking Out for Your Health? History Tells a Different Story. (childrenshealthdefense.org)  (10/6/21)
  2. A staggering 45% of the entire FDA‘s $5.9 billion budget and 65% of the funding for human drug regulatory activities are funded by Big Pharma: Why is the FDA funded in part by the companies it regulates? (theconversation.com).
  3. The FDA recently approved the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine on Aug. 23, 2021.
    1. Such an approval was totally illegal according to Dr. Jane Ruby on the Stew Peters Show.  They did not follow normal procedures.
    2. Pfizer vaccine approved behind closed doors – (thetruthaboutcancer.com) The FDA “approved” Pfizer’s COVID-19 jab for 16 years and older – officially declaring it “safe and effective” – without even allowing public discussion or holding a formal advisory committee meeting to discuss data.
    3. FDA Approves Gates’ Vaccine After Accepting Funding from Him | Armstrong Economics
    4. US Drug Regulators Approve Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine (theepochtimes.com) 8/23/21
    5. Children’s Health Defense calls FDA’s COVID vaccine approval for Pfizer premature, arbitrary and capricious – LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)
    6. Despite thousands of deaths and adverse reactions FDA rushes to grant full approval to Pfizer COVID jab – LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)
  4. Revolving doors of FDA and Big Pharma – Nexus Newsfeed
  5. More Than 726,000 COVID Vaccine Injuries Reported to VAERS as CDC, FDA Overrule Advisory Committees’ Recommendations on Third Pfizer Shot • Children’s Health Defense (childrenshealthdefense.org)  (9/24/21)
  6. FDA says natural immunity against COVID doesn’t exist, discounts the entire existence of antibodies – NaturalNews.com
  7. How a false hydroxychloroquine narrative was created – 47 steps involving the FDA and other parties.  (5/26/21)
  8. The biggest crime committed during the vaccine heist is the censorship of Ivermectin – LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)
  9. FDA still drags its feet on Ivermectin
    • Ivermectin’s success in battling COVID-19 – America’s Frontline Doctors (americasfrontlinedoctors.org)
      • While these (60+) studies suggested that Ivermectin was indeed a safe, cheap, and effective treatment for COVID-19, many public health policy makers refused to permit its use to treat and prevent COVID-19. The FDA in it’s statement said that the “FDA has not approved ivermectin for use in treating or preventing COVID-19” later explaining that “The FDA has not reviewed data to support use of ivermectin in COVID-19 patients to treat or to prevent COVID-19”.  I wonder why not?
  10. FDA exposed as a criminal body parts cartel involved in routine harvesting of organs from LIVING human babies – NaturalNews.com  (2/11/21)

Media attacks early treatment promoters

8/27/21 Press Release by AFLDS – MEDIA IN BIG PHARMA’S POCKET, ATTACKS PHYSICIANS WHO PROMOTE CHEAP, EFFECTIVE, EARLY TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR COVID-19 – America’s Frontline Doctors (americasfrontlinedoctors.org)

Key points:

Globally it is well known that early treatment works but this truth continues to be frantically suppressed by the dishonest American media… the mainstream media failed to report >300 studies showing early treatment works, including the American Journal of Medicine and the American Journal of Therapeutics and the treatment algorithm posted by Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. The Wall Street Journal did attempt to shame the FDA for trying to block people’s access to the Nobel Prize winning drug.

AFLDS has been maliciously attacked as part of an ongoing, orchestrated effort by media outlets who are making billions from Big Pharma and pandemic-related government advertising. The CDC’s own data debunks the government and pharmaceutical industry’s narrative that only vaccines can save us from from Covid-19. In fact, the CDC’s own numbers reveal the truth… even without treatment, the survival rate is 99.98% under age 50 and almost 95% over age 70. Both numbers approach 100% with early treatment.

The vaccines will not protect you from delta and future variants, and have serious side effects, including death (>13,000 in the CDC database VAERS). Doctors have always known that natural immunity is far superior (more robust, longer lasting) to vaccine immunity, and the data is now accumulating that the vaccines are failing with vaccinated people being 13x more likely than unvaccinated to be diagnosed and 27x more likely to become sick. The latest research portends great harm from the vaccines. A recent study of healthcare workers in Vietnam showed that the vaccinated group had 251x the viral load of the unvaccinated group. This is consistent with ADE (antibody dependent enhancement), about which AFLDS warned the world in November, 2020.

AFLDS continues to encourage the public to remain calm. The delta variant is very contagious but clinically milder than the original Wuhan variant. Covid-19 has a very high survivability rate and with an increased effort to protect physician independence and patient choice, we will save even more lives.

Dr. Alexander 15-point COVID Plan

Dr. Paul Elias Alexander is a research methodologist, evidence-based medicine specialist, former COVID pandemic advisor to Health and Human Services in the Trump administration, and a former COVID pandemic evidence synthesis advisor to WHO-PAHO, DC.

Caution: This common sense plan has NO regard for Big Pharma profits nor political correctness; nor does it provide any cover for all the bad decisions and non-science based policies made by corrupt politicians, CDC, WHO, FDA and the NIH.  I guess that’s why it is so appealing 🙂

Dr. Paul Elias Alexander’s 15-point COVID-19 pandemic reopening plan – LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.