Why distrust the WHO

  1. How a false hydroxychloroquine narrative was created – 47 steps involving the WHO and other parties.
  2. The biggest crime committed during the vaccine heist is the censorship of Ivermectin – LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)
  3. Key definition changes by the WHO to make pandemic a more urgent crisis.
    1. Pandemic: Disease spreading worldwide.  Dropped from definition: (1) abnormally high number of sick people, and (2) abnormally high number of deaths.
    2. Herd Immunity: Can only be achieved via vaccination.  Previous definition: achieved from a majority of people getting infected and recovering + vaccination.
    3. Why Did the WHO Alter Its Definition of “Herd Immunity?”
    4. Highly unvaccinated India had a surge in COVID cases earlier this year which abruptly ended following the widespread use of ivermectin, over the objections and criticism of the WHO. In the one state, Tamil Nadu, that did not use ivermectin, cases tripled instead of dropping by 97 percent as in the rest of the country.
    • “TrustWHO,” a documentary film produced by Lilian Franck, reveals the clandestine influences that are controlling the World Health Organization, to the peril of public health.
    • Bill Gates is WHO’s No. 1 funder, contributing more to WHO’s $4.84 billion biennial budget than any member-state government.
    • Pharmaceutical companies previously influenced WHO’s 2009 pandemic declaration —  experts later called swine flu a “false pandemic” that was driven by Big Pharma, which then cashed in on the health scare.
    • WHO has strong allegiance to China, and its investigation into COVID-19’s origin was a “fake” investigation from the start.
    • Even prior to the COVID-19 pandemicWHO released a statement that it had been in discussions with Facebook to “ensure people can access authoritative information on vaccines and reduce the spread of inaccuracies.”
    • WHO’s history clearly illustrates its allegiance to Big Pharma and other industries, including downplaying the health effects caused by the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster and collaborating with opioid giant Purdue.
    • Given the strong and ongoing evidence that WHO is heavily conflicted and controlled by industry, its usefulness as a guardian of public health needs to be seriously reevaluated.
  4. The WHO pressured governments and professional societies to stop doctors prescribing hydroxychloroquine.  (Reuters, 5/26/21)
  5. MSN Showcases the Amazing Uttar Pradesh Turnaround—The Ivermectin-based Home Medicine Kits (trialsitenews.com)  (9/19/21)
    • MSN appears to be the first mainstream news source to recognize the amazing feat accomplished by the health agencies in India’s most populous state. The state experienced a massive spike in infections by April, but just two months later, the turnaround was well on its way, and what ensued should have been the story of the year
    • The WHO praised the effort but omitted the use of Ivermectin
    • The WHO went on the offense once India established Ivermectin on its national protocol. WHO’s chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan tweeted that Ivermectin should not be used, referencing Merck’s warning about the drug. See TrialSite’s entry on the Merck-Ivermectin warning topic. Of course, this tweet triggered the Indian bar association lawsuit against WHO. Indirectly including Merck in her tweet, WHO’s Dr. Swaminathan insulted not only millions of people but also evidenced her true naivety… Merck has a huge conflict of interest in that they have a competing COVID-19 therapeutic—Molnupiravir.  Most certainly, that’s why over the past few months, an intense and particularly vile smear campaign emerged in mainstream media [against Ivermectin].
  6. Corruption of the WHO and Bill Gates (28-minute video: GAVI is an NGO that pays no taxes yet has complete criminal immunity.
  7. Whistleblower claims WHO requested he alter report about Italy’s COVID response – Frontline News
  8. NIH Guidelines committee created for Covid treatment recommendations, in which 16 members have or had financial entanglements with Gilead, maker of Remdesivir. The members were appointed by the Co-Chairs. Two of the three Co-Chairs are themselves financially entangled with Gilead. Are you surprised that their guidelines recommend specifically against the use of hydroxychloroquine and in favor of Remdesivir, despite a Chinese Phase III study showing no benefit, which was mistakenly posted on the WHO website, then taken down?
  9. More Pandemic Corruption: Refusal to Fully Recognize Natural Immunity (trialsitenews.com)
    • Natural Antibodies Persist for More Than a Year After Infection: New Peer-Reviewed Study Finds (theepochtimes.com)  (10/4/21)
    • (6/1/21)  A recent study from the Cleveland Clinic found that individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection and have natural immunity are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccines can be safely prioritized to those who have not been infected before.
    • One study, published in The Lancet’s journal EClinicalMedicine, examined data from antibodies in 39,086 individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 from March 2020 and January 2021. It found an “encouraging timeline for the development and sustainability of antibodies up to ten months from natural infection.” This latest study adds to a growing body of scientific evidence indicating that natural immunity is long-lasting even without vaccination.
    • Another study, in Nature, found that COVID-19 infection “induces a robust antigen-specific, long-lived humoral immune response in humans,” with antibodies “remaining detectable at least 11 months after infection.” Another, published at BioRxiv, found that even without vaccination, antibodies in the infected “remain relatively stable from 6 to 12 months,” while “B cell clones expressing broad and potent antibodies are selectively retained in the repertoire over time and expand dramatically after vaccination.” Another study from Israel found that natural immunity was slightly more effective against reinfection than the Pfizer vaccine, at 94.8% versus 92.8%.