Campaign against Ivermectin

  1. India’s Ivermectin Success Blackout by CDC, NIH, media, Wikipedia | ZeroHedge  (8/13/21)
    • See article for graph showing the dramatic improvement in COVID-19 cases and deaths after Ivermectin was distributed in the Uttar Pradesh province of India, April-July 2021.
    • There is a blackout on any conversation about how Ivermectin beat COVID-19 in India.  Ask yourself why India’s success against the Delta variant with Ivermectin is such a closely guarded secret by the NIH and CDC. Second, ask yourself why no major media outlets reported this fact, but instead, tried to confuse you with false information by saying the deaths in India are 10 times greater than official reports.
    • Wikipedia cannot mention the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie or Dr. Pierre Kory published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.   Nor is Wikipedia is allowed to publish the recent meta-analysis on Ivermectin authored by Dr. Andrew Hill, nor say anything concerning www.ivmmeta.com which shows the 63 studies comprising 23,000 patients which reveal an average of 86% reduction in death [prophylaxis] with Ivermectin.
    • MSN Showcases the Amazing Uttar Pradesh Turnaround—The Ivermectin-based Home Medicine Kits (trialsitenews.com)  (9/19/21)
      • MSN appears to be the first mainstream news source to recognize the amazing feat accomplished by the health agencies in India’s most populous state. The state experienced a massive spike in infections by April, but just two months later, the turnaround was well on its way, and what ensued should have been the story of the year
      • The WHO praised the effort but omitted the use of Ivermectin and early treatment
      • The WHO went on the offense once India established Ivermectin on its national protocol. WHO’s chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan tweeted that Ivermectin should not be used, referencing Merck’s warning about the drug. See TrialSite’s entry on the Merck-Ivermectin warning topic. Of course, this tweet triggered the Indian bar association lawsuit against WHO. Indirectly including Merck in her tweet, WHO’s Dr. Swaminathan insulted not only millions of people but also evidenced her true naivety… Merck has a huge conflict of interest in that they have a competing COVID-19 therapeutic—Molnupiravir.  Most certainly, that’s why over the past few months, an intense and particularly vile smear campaign emerged in mainstream media [against Ivermectin].
  2. Dr. Pierre Kory presents the evidence base supporting the efficacy of Ivermectin in prevention and treatment of COVID-19 to an audience of medical and other leaders in Sri Lanka (odysee.com)  and discusses the corruption of the medical establishment in suppressing Ivermectin (39-minute video plus 11 minutes of Q&A, 10/5/21)
  3. EXPOSED! FDA, CDC, NIH & WHO is hiding this from you? | Dr Paul Marik FLCCC – Vijaya Viswanathan – YouTube   9/6/21 (44 minutes at normal playback speed)
    • Ivermectin is cheap, safe, and effective against COVID-19 if used in combination with other drugs.
    • 3.7 billion people have been treated safely with Ivermectin
    • Physician reluctance to prescribe it due to intimidation by FDA and Hospital management (16:21)
    • Hospitals, FDA, CDC, NIH and WHO, the media, New England Journal of Medicine, and The Lancet medical journal are are all heavily funded and/or heavily influenced by Big Pharma
    • The NIH owns part of many patents and makes a lot of money from patented drugs and vaccines (conflict of interest).  And they can’t make any money off of cheap, repurposed drugs like Ivermectin.
    • For my detailed notes by minute/second marks, see Dr. Paul Marik on Suppressing Ivermectin
  4. Is Ivermectin Being Discredited To Pave Way For Big Pharma’s New Version Of Same Drug? (redvoicemedia.com)
    • The Armageddon that was unleashed this past week, in every form of media, from nighttime talk show hosts to every newspaper, to CNN to television, screaming about how this is a horse drug, and that people are dying from taking animal forms, you will understand why that was unleashed. <Big Pharma needs> to get rid of Ivermectin.
  5. The Great Ivermectin Deworming Hoax
  6.  SC Senate – Medical Affairs Subcommittee Testimony of Dr. Robert Jackson – YouTube  (9/22/21,  33 minutes but you can watch at 1.5x speed)
    • Excellent example of a Physician in the trenches vs. politicians and hospital administrators who would prefer to “follow established protocols” and avoid Ivermectin
    • Dr. Jackson related how his job at Spartanburg Regional is at risk for prescribing Ivermectin
    • Dr. Jackson mentioned Dr. Kory’s testimony on Ivermectin; also the excellent results in Peru, Argentina, India, and Mexico City.
    • Ivermectin is safe: 1 death/year vs. 500 deaths per year by Tylenol.
  7. Reuters show bias Attacking Ivermectin
  8. Why all the fuss about Ivermectin and why is the establishment attacking it? – LifeSite (lifesitenews.com)
    • When FDA-approved medications are used in appropriate doses for appropriate patients, prescribed by competent physicians, the risks tend to be low, and any benefit should be celebrated. Instead, the medical establishment, media, and regulatory authorities are taking the opposite approach.
    • A study published several months ago in the American Journal of Therapeutics concluded Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery… and significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular [prophylactic] use of ivermectin.
    • Highly unvaccinated India had a surge in COVID cases earlier this year which abruptly ended following the widespread use of ivermectin, over the objections and criticism of the WHO. In the one state, Tamil Nadu, that did not use ivermectin, cases tripled instead of dropping by 97 percent as in the rest of the country.
    • The Japanese Medical Association recently endorsed ivermectin for COVID. The U.S. CDC cautioned against it.
    • Medical treatment involves balancing risks and benefits. When FDA-approved medications are used in appropriate doses for appropriate patients, prescribed by competent physicians, the risks tend to be low, and any benefit should be celebrated. Instead, the medical establishment, media, and regulatory authorities are taking the opposite approach. One has to wonder why. 

Conclusion of many: the use of cheap, effective treatments is not in the best interest of Big Pharma and Governments who wish to keep the people in a state of fear and compliance so they take the vaccine.